<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Web 2.0 Blog &#187; Networked Audience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.web20blog.org/tag/networked-audience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.web20blog.org</link>
	<description>Getting Results from Web and Social Media Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 07:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mobsourcing vs Crowdsourcing: Can conformity occasionally make for a more reliable crowd?</title>
		<link>http://www.web20blog.org/2008/12/26/mobsourcing-vs-crowdsourcing-does-deliberation-make-the-difference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web20blog.org/2008/12/26/mobsourcing-vs-crowdsourcing-does-deliberation-make-the-difference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 16:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Fischer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networked Audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisdom of the crowds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web20new.wordpress.com/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my last post I started to examine the claim of the cluetrain manifesto that a more networked audience is more intelligent or at least a better detector than an individual. The #Mumbai victim list twitter distribution illustrated 4 ways which a network can apply truth filters and 2 ways in which the network affects [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web20blog.org/2008/12/26/mobsourcing-vs-crowdsourcing-does-deliberation-make-the-difference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Difference a Network Makes: #Mumbai Attack and Twitter demonstrate the changing behavior of a networked audience.</title>
		<link>http://www.web20blog.org/2008/12/17/the-difference-a-network-makes-mumbai-attack-and-twitter-demonstrate-the-changing-behavior-of-a-networked-audience/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web20blog.org/2008/12/17/the-difference-a-network-makes-mumbai-attack-and-twitter-demonstrate-the-changing-behavior-of-a-networked-audience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Fischer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cluetrain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google docs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networked Audience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web20new.wordpress.com/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Note: I have not verified the list of the Mumbai victims referenced here nor do I take a stand on its authenticity, accuracy or morality. I think its a very interesting example of how a networked audience behaves differently than an non-networked audience. The mention of the increasing intelligence of a networked audience is what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web20blog.org/2008/12/17/the-difference-a-network-makes-mumbai-attack-and-twitter-demonstrate-the-changing-behavior-of-a-networked-audience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

